AG Magdeburg 140 C 2640/09 (140) in the proceedings the plaintiff the defendant, accused to have offered a computer program where the applicant has held the exclusive rights of use and exploitation, to the functional analysis of motor vehicles, in the context of a peer-to-peer network unauthorized. The District Court of Magdeburg denies the applicability of 97a II Copyright Act in the judgment. This is explained as follows: “contrary to the view of the defendants came also a restriction of the lawyer fees on 100.00 pursuant to 97a para 2 UrhG not taken into consideration. A simple bearing case does not exist. In particular, the frequency of such breaches of the law and the routine when the prosecution arising from this is no argument for the adoption of a simple storage case. More so, buy levitra in canada the purpose of a distance learning M. It also leads to various sexual disorders such as involuntary ejaculation during cheap cialis 5mg sleep and low libido. There is a solution! If you’re desperately looking for sure treatment at home, then this website on line levitra is your ultimate destination. Below are some of the drugs that are available to treat male impotency. viagra 50mg “Also of note of the defendants, she had acted non-commercial, does not justify a different legal decision.” Also in this issue we denied the applicability of 97a II Copyright Act due to lack of existence of a simple storage case. The Court in particular, that the mass persecution of any copyright infringement and the resulting routine when the prosecution represents just an argument for the existence of a simple storage case. Noted still remains, that the Court has considered a value totalling EUR 20,000 for reasonable. This is the full text of the decision justified by the considerable interest of the applicant to eliminate any infringement through file sharing systems you will find here! Her Tobias Arnold